From hosting@trilug.org Wed Oct 9 04:55:30 2002 From: hosting@trilug.org (Jack Denny) Date: Wed Oct 9 03:55:30 2002 Subject: [Hosting] Viagra Message-ID: <5410zp11gh.p8ke@earthlink.net>

Are you aged 20 to 70 and interested in viagra?

You can order Viagra Online, legally and risk free!

*** Less than $7.00 per dose! ***

No hassle ordering process
Delivered to home or office
Complete confidentially
Handled by US licensed Doctors

Join the millions of men that use Viagra!
Come vist our website and check us out!

List Removal Instructions: To receive no further information regarding Viagra or any of our other products respond to this email with the word 'Remove' in the subject line.

eivt From hosting@trilug.org Fri Oct 11 04:00:41 2002 From: hosting@trilug.org (Thunder Bear) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Hosting] Red Hat on fatalpha Message-ID: Hmmm and here I thought we were stuck with Red Hat 6.2 or whatever ancient release is on fatalpha... http://www.support.compaq.com/alpha-tools/redhat/ Thunder Bear "The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly." -Abraham Lincoln From hosting@trilug.org Fri Oct 11 17:26:14 2002 From: hosting@trilug.org (Jeremy Portzer) Date: 11 Oct 2002 12:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Hosting] Red Hat on fatalpha In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1034353575.11015.1.camel@jeremy.dtcc.cc.nc.us> On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 23:00, Thunder Bear wrote: > Hmmm and here I thought we were stuck with Red Hat 6.2 or whatever > ancient release is on fatalpha... Actually, if you'll check bugzilla, you'll see that Tanner has long had plans to upgrade fatalpha. > http://www.support.compaq.com/alpha-tools/redhat/ > My understanding is that RHL 7.2 isn't supported by Red Hat -- they don't produce errata, etc, for it. The latest supported version is 7.1, which is what was previously installed on bucky and mudfoot. --Jeremy From hosting@trilug.org Fri Oct 11 17:38:02 2002 From: hosting@trilug.org (Thunder Bear) Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Hosting] Red Hat on fatalpha In-Reply-To: <1034353575.11015.1.camel@jeremy.dtcc.cc.nc.us> Message-ID: On Friday, October 11, 2002, at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Portzer wrote: > The latest supported version is 7.1, > which is what was previously installed on bucky and mudfoot. Not anymore. :-) bash-2.05a# uname -a OpenBSD silverback01 3.1 GENERIC#40 alpha Thunder Bear Experimental local weblog at http://yonderway.com/dot "The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly." -Abraham Lincoln From hosting@trilug.org Fri Oct 11 18:06:55 2002 From: hosting@trilug.org (Jeremy Portzer) Date: 11 Oct 2002 13:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Hosting] Red Hat on fatalpha In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1034356015.11015.8.camel@jeremy.dtcc.cc.nc.us> On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 12:38, Thunder Bear wrote: > > On Friday, October 11, 2002, at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Portzer wrote: > > > The latest supported version is 7.1, > > which is what was previously installed on bucky and mudfoot. > > Not anymore. :-) > > bash-2.05a# uname -a > OpenBSD silverback01 3.1 GENERIC#40 alpha Right, that's why I said "previously" :-) Are you still running it with all 128MB of RAM in one box? --Jeremy From hosting@trilug.org Fri Oct 11 18:19:52 2002 From: hosting@trilug.org (Chris Hedemark) Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Hosting] Red Hat on fatalpha In-Reply-To: <1034356015.11015.8.camel@jeremy.dtcc.cc.nc.us> Message-ID: Yeah. Check out http://yonderway.com/dot and scroll down til you see the "DIGITAL" logo. I posted a dmesg from OpenBSD and some other stuff. On Friday, October 11, 2002, at 01:06 PM, Jeremy Portzer wrote: > On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 12:38, Thunder Bear wrote: >> >> On Friday, October 11, 2002, at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Portzer wrote: >> >>> The latest supported version is 7.1, >>> which is what was previously installed on bucky and mudfoot. >> >> Not anymore. :-) >> >> bash-2.05a# uname -a >> OpenBSD silverback01 3.1 GENERIC#40 alpha > > Right, that's why I said "previously" :-) > > Are you still running it with all 128MB of RAM in one box? > > --Jeremy > > _______________________________________________ > Hosting mailing list > Hosting@trilug.org > http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/hosting > > Thunder Bear Experimental local weblog at http://yonderway.com/dot "The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly." -Abraham Lincoln From hosting@trilug.org Mon Oct 28 04:26:14 2002 From: hosting@trilug.org (Jeremy Portzer) Date: 27 Oct 2002 23:26:14 -0500 Subject: [Hosting] [Fwd: Re: [TriLUG] dyndns] Message-ID: <1035779177.1270.4.camel@silverstar> I think this is a great idea... anyone see any drawbacks? Anyone have any experience doing this kind of thing? --Jeremy -----Forwarded Message----- From: Jason Tower To: trilug@trilug.org Subject: Re: [TriLUG] dyndns Date: 27 Oct 2002 20:56:07 -0500 i don't know the particulars of trilug's hosting at inflow, but would it be possible to run our own DNS server with dynamic update capabilities? that way members could get membername.trilug.org mapped to their own IPs. a quick glance at freshmeat showed several possible candidates: http://www.cencula.com/dynamicdns.html http://www.ddts.org/about.php3 http://www.dhis.org/ http://freshmeat.net/projects/dyndnsservice/?topic_id=150%2C149 just a thought - jason On Sunday 27 October 2002 18:53, Greg Brown wrote: > I was just getting ready to get dynamic DNS up and running when I read > on dyndns that they no longer offer .dyndns.org. You are now > required to register a domain name any pay the $50.00 per year for the > service. > > Is there another dynamic DNS provider out there that anyone suggests > using? > > Greg > > _______________________________________________ > TriLUG mailing list > http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug > TriLUG Organizational FAQ: > http://www.trilug.org/~lovelace/faq/TriLUG-faq.html -- Jason Tower Cerient Technologies jason@cerient.net _______________________________________________ TriLUG mailing list http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ: http://www.trilug.org/~lovelace/faq/TriLUG-faq.html