From nivex at nivex.net  Thu Feb 16 09:04:11 2017
From: nivex at nivex.net (Kevin Otte)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:04:11 -0500
Subject: [Linux-ham] RARSFest 2017
Message-ID: <bae57049-ece8-5c33-4ed4-c616998fd2da@nivex.net>

April 15th this year. Just got my flyer in the mail. Hope to see some of
you there.

http://www.rars.org/rarsfest/

73 de N8VNR

From jc.jones at tuftux.com  Thu Feb 16 09:38:19 2017
From: jc.jones at tuftux.com (James Jones)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:38:19 -0500
Subject: [Linux-ham] RARSFest 2017
In-Reply-To: <bae57049-ece8-5c33-4ed4-c616998fd2da@nivex.net>
References: <bae57049-ece8-5c33-4ed4-c616998fd2da@nivex.net>
Message-ID: <CAAo6Ht2M-SqWb2gSLQwmx524GsAJSyjN9o8Hsq9UzQCHYXzSvg@mail.gmail.com>

Kevin,

Wonder how attendance will be since that is Easter Weekend.

jcj

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Kevin Otte <nivex at nivex.net> wrote:
> April 15th this year. Just got my flyer in the mail. Hope to see some of
> you there.
>
> http://www.rars.org/rarsfest/
>
> 73 de N8VNR
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-ham mailing list
> Linux-ham at trilug.org
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ham



-- 
Jc Jones
Blogs -
http://www.wendellgeek.com/weblog/
http://www.wendellgeek.com/kixtech/

From eric at christensenplace.us  Thu Feb 16 09:39:42 2017
From: eric at christensenplace.us (Eric Christensen)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:39:42 -0500
Subject: [Linux-ham] RARSFest 2017
In-Reply-To: <CAAo6Ht2M-SqWb2gSLQwmx524GsAJSyjN9o8Hsq9UzQCHYXzSvg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <bae57049-ece8-5c33-4ed4-c616998fd2da@nivex.net>
 <CAAo6Ht2M-SqWb2gSLQwmx524GsAJSyjN9o8Hsq9UzQCHYXzSvg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0e5d54ee-9485-130d-c870-4aa01fdce5d3@christensenplace.us>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 02/16/2017 09:38 AM, James Jones wrote:
> Wonder how attendance will be since that is Easter Weekend.

It's always on Easter weekend.

- --Eric

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJYpbmiAAoJEIPRTy7KnFlsIi0H/Ru19rcfJi2crxxd9Y7SwTyX
VgSEXRVDtnoT1K2HZ51dkV82CEgwWVM/sDEQJbzk0dPRS8kwrnyQPtbEt+IoBZ1d
LHv5zhkEwnf2Flq27M65QDook0p2jRZ4JDdCpkn1RBOM+V7kpZZGnFDmY/cBS98D
Bjp+/oQUU6wXtzhGebCjO/WWBtL6+/JOJNBcIb6TInZxJPzd5gZO3LB2sfydTUmF
/ErlwI5hIh1LyOlZmSVAuJIB3fG+PRIF+CDRBhpYwRe1CFlktpyIqW/dIv+5ly0Z
sNrZHDCzNl3+0N8tbzKZVH9YMYQvYjydtlp8cjDd1k9smqn57vTn3pTILAq3IwU=
=TzFI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From nivex at nivex.net  Thu Feb 16 11:02:49 2017
From: nivex at nivex.net (Kevin Otte)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:02:49 -0500
Subject: [Linux-ham] Fwd: [Freetel-codec2] FreeDV GUI 1.2
In-Reply-To: <d7fdb423-b697-f8f7-484c-0f2089159279@rowetel.com>
References: <d7fdb423-b697-f8f7-484c-0f2089159279@rowetel.com>
Message-ID: <c112ec26-645b-4ee2-59a6-6ee4b7fd06c0@nivex.net>

Linux packages are usually forthcoming in a short while. If you're game
to compile you can check out from Subversion:
https://svn.code.sf.net/p/freetel/code/freedv/branches/1.2/


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [Freetel-codec2] FreeDV GUI 1.2
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:34:47 +1030
From: David Rowe <david at rowetel.com>
Reply-To: freetel-codec2 at lists.sourceforge.net
To: freetel-codec2 at lists.sourceforge.net, digitalvoice at googlegroups.com

Hello Lists,

Thanks to some nice work by Richard and the kind support of testers we
have released version 1.2 of the FreeDV GUI program that includes Codec
2 700C.  Tony, K2MO, has also produced a great demo video showing the
various FreeDV modes in action.  Here's the scoop:

   http://www.rowetel.com/?p=5456

32 and 64 bit Windows versions of FreeDV GUI 1.2 can be downloaded from:

   http://freedv.org

Thanks,

David




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2 at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

From bordtrp1 at gmail.com  Thu Feb 16 15:27:58 2017
From: bordtrp1 at gmail.com (Raymond Bordt)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:27:58 -0500
Subject: [Linux-ham] Fwd: [Freetel-codec2] FreeDV GUI 1.2
In-Reply-To: <c112ec26-645b-4ee2-59a6-6ee4b7fd06c0@nivex.net>
References: <d7fdb423-b697-f8f7-484c-0f2089159279@rowetel.com>
 <c112ec26-645b-4ee2-59a6-6ee4b7fd06c0@nivex.net>
Message-ID: <44BCC3E7-9D6B-46E2-B774-2CA9D01C2A16@gmail.com>

Hi

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 16, 2017, at 11:02 AM, Kevin Otte <nivex at nivex.net> wrote:
> 
> Linux packages are usually forthcoming in a short while. If you're game
> to compile you can check out from Subversion:
> https://svn.code.sf.net/p/freetel/code/freedv/branches/1.2/
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: [Freetel-codec2] FreeDV GUI 1.2
> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:34:47 +1030
> From: David Rowe <david at rowetel.com>
> Reply-To: freetel-codec2 at lists.sourceforge.net
> To: freetel-codec2 at lists.sourceforge.net, digitalvoice at googlegroups.com
> 
> Hello Lists,
> 
> Thanks to some nice work by Richard and the kind support of testers we
> have released version 1.2 of the FreeDV GUI program that includes Codec
> 2 700C.  Tony, K2MO, has also produced a great demo video showing the
> various FreeDV modes in action.  Here's the scoop:
> 
>   http://www.rowetel.com/?p=5456
> 
> 32 and 64 bit Windows versions of FreeDV GUI 1.2 can be downloaded from:
> 
>   http://freedv.org
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> Freetel-codec2 at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-ham mailing list
> Linux-ham at trilug.org
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ham

From nivex at nivex.net  Tue Feb 21 11:05:08 2017
From: nivex at nivex.net (Kevin Otte)
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:05:08 -0500
Subject: Encapsulation test
Message-ID: <18dcf2ee-b0b1-4445-95ce-461743171117@nivex.net>

As part of the ongoing DKIM discussion, I am testing out the message
wrapping option. Hopefully this will let messages get through folks'
anti-spam measures without too much trouble.

73!

From stephen at stephenbryant.net  Tue Feb 21 11:34:34 2017
From: stephen at stephenbryant.net (Stephen Bryant)
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:34:34 -0500
Subject: [Linux-ham] Encapsulation test
In-Reply-To: <mailman.144.1487693112.2231.linux-ham@trilug.org>
References: <mailman.144.1487693112.2231.linux-ham@trilug.org>
Message-ID: <CAOg=rh8mos8bs=1-b810pSLJ0sWNotYzh2CiK74L0no6iyVh6g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Kevin,

Just wanted to reply back and say that this came through fine on both GMail
and Apple Mail, though it appears to still be doing the from/reply-to
munging. Here's a screenshot of what I see in Gmail:
https://i.imgur.com/Wcml52F.png

Stephen

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Kevin Otte via Linux-ham <
linux-ham at trilug.org> wrote:

> _______________________________________________
> Linux-ham mailing list
> Linux-ham at trilug.org
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ham
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Kevin Otte <nivex at nivex.net>
> To: linux-ham at trilug.org
> Cc:
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:05:08 -0500
> Subject: Encapsulation test
> As part of the ongoing DKIM discussion, I am testing out the message
> wrapping option. Hopefully this will let messages get through folks'
> anti-spam measures without too much trouble.
>
> 73!
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/linux-ham/attachments/20170221/54565d92/attachment.html>

From eric at christensenplace.us  Tue Feb 21 14:10:02 2017
From: eric at christensenplace.us (Eric Christensen)
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:10:02 -0500
Subject: [Linux-ham] Encapsulation test
In-Reply-To: <mailman.144.1487693112.2231.linux-ham@trilug.org>
References: <mailman.144.1487693112.2231.linux-ham@trilug.org>
Message-ID: <21a38a3e-02a8-fa2d-d1cb-935d0106b6e2@christensenplace.us>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Encapsulated messages also seems to prevent the original text from being
automatically placed in a reply (for better or worse).  I feel there
must be a better way...

I know I was having issues with the system breaking DMARC so I'll see
what sending this does.

73,
Eric WG3K
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJYrJCEAAoJEIPRTy7KnFlsi70H/1ztJva47gTm5Abk/f17O3Mh
OGVhXqlL4ZXnHAfvj7QJD22T05ak4U4TYgaqB3ocdWLXXxUbhMMw3h8DAqjG0oUg
Xemr1Z4VQmG+fWFE7g17QIKvHoUdGiBZ0pyTMS0vj0BYZydN9FYpIivwFEaqSmFS
mwr/WrNzamhu+gPiNEGcamsUd4HQoES9DbSrMvp5HbrIqTY24h2VTIF6Y78X3wMj
1yA9ePpzo211g0Rtr14VVc1pGQyi7QX6YLTrd+NvVq3k+akzQgTN8jSl8vT6mh7N
C8IxH17TyLm54jjxIBCxi3iQCsCLOO3AeQoBMQ4z2q+bnH4h7C/QJzXyaq6/51A=
=mFCE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From aaron at schrab.com  Tue Feb 21 14:17:52 2017
From: aaron at schrab.com (Aaron Schrab)
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:17:52 -0500
Subject: Encapsulation test
In-Reply-To: <mailman.146.1487704206.2231.linux-ham@trilug.org>
References: <mailman.144.1487693112.2231.linux-ham@trilug.org>
 <mailman.146.1487704206.2231.linux-ham@trilug.org>
Message-ID: <20170221191752.GA2105@pug.qqx.org>

At 14:10 -0500 21 Feb 2017, Eric Christensen via Linux-ham <linux-ham at trilug.org> wrote:
>Encapsulated messages also seems to prevent the original text from 
>being automatically placed in a reply (for better or worse).

That completely depends on your mail client. With mutt the message that 
I'm replying to was automatically quoted same as before.

Aaron W4QQX
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 293 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/linux-ham/attachments/20170221/5eee4899/attachment.pgp>

From eric at christensenplace.us  Tue Feb 21 14:19:30 2017
From: eric at christensenplace.us (Eric Christensen)
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:19:30 -0500
Subject: [Linux-ham] Encapsulation test
In-Reply-To: <mailman.147.1487704675.2231.linux-ham@trilug.org>
References: <mailman.144.1487693112.2231.linux-ham@trilug.org>
 <mailman.146.1487704206.2231.linux-ham@trilug.org>
 <mailman.147.1487704675.2231.linux-ham@trilug.org>
Message-ID: <f9e4c923-6280-c154-5bbb-469ee5e5a164@christensenplace.us>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 02/21/2017 02:17 PM, Aaron Schrab via Linux-ham wrote:
> That completely depends on your mail client. With mutt the message that
> I'm replying to was automatically quoted same as before.

Yeah, mutt should probably just see text and not get confused with all
the layers.  Thunderbird will at least put the text in that I've
highlighted, which is perfectly acceptable, just different from default.

- --Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJYrJLBAAoJEIPRTy7KnFlsRrEH/3y1IlLqx5i49tL+xUV299cm
wJ5VGO88V0iiLjDIS5mjcWBqA6j5+jydH/URyGEbOYO9sUzbz2/ICjnjAMxALL2w
+x/zihsqrOy65JQ0JEZNrB84/ErhGcNmd95lLU/G5gnQPGgG4wtuQCoPM26va976
tDSE/ArBu5C8JBO7+6x5TxgGOalV2ltX1whXzxX3vqPbixyHm2gsza979O0sSaY7
Lpk3Wsh1pOemVYsDmwJdgsfcKDYeD9aWPY3AY5ckWhjv1W8MGLG3RarxcNyhy9cx
IG6YvsvPtq39tU/54UP5khqsEoBfpXci1npzGZ8MwPl6/IdKI+XDsI+M1ElGbW8=
=SNpn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----