Linux Server Backup Solutions
Jeremy Portzer
jeremyp at pobox.com
Fri May 14 12:11:27 EDT 2004
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 11:37, Jason Tower wrote:
> > Even despite this caveat, I don't see why people put up with the
> > hassle of maintaining tape drives, tapes, libraries, and the
> > inconvenience of a character-device backup system. Hard drives are
> > SO MUCH EASIER on you, the sysadmin, the user when restores are
> > needed, and the bottom line, in most cases.
>
> because LOTS of sysadmins send backups offsite at least once in a while
Good point. My main backup server (at work) is indeed "off-site" (it's
at one of our satellite locations). But this isn't necessarily
available to everyone.
--Jeremy
--
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer jeremyp at pobox.com trilug.org/~jeremy |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.ncsysadmin.org/pipermail/ncsa-discussion/attachments/20040514/57f73a7e/attachment.bin
More information about the ncsa-discussion
mailing list