[Trilug-ontopic] CentOS/Fedora/RHEL? was: RHEL5 help..
jsnonzzr at gmail.com
Tue Jun 3 12:59:07 EDT 2008
my misguided knowledge says CentOS vs RHEL same thing... one is free the
other isn't With redhat's you get the support and possibly some proprietary
code that isn't quite available in CentOS. these two are meant to be stable
and more sever oriented. RHEL vs Fedora... Fedora is less stable then
RHEL. Fedora is meant to be the free version of their OS... more for
desktop use. might be wrong here, but you tend to find code that hasn't
been as tested as their RHEL edition.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche at pobox.com> wrote:
> Cristóbal Palmer Tue Jun 3 09:45:58 EDT 2008
> > If you don't want to pay for [an RHEL] license, then you should
> > really be using CentOS.
> BTW: what's the difference between CentOS, Fedora, and RHEL? I don't
> quite understand the partitioning, except that I understand (possibly
> incorrectly) that the latter is licensed/supported and the former are
> not. Also, why the coyness @
> > CentOS is an Enterprise-class Linux Distribution derived from
> > sources freely provided to the public by a prominent North American
> > Enterprise Linux vendor.
> ? It's Red Hat, right?
> Trilug-ontopic mailing list
> Trilug-ontopic at trilug.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Trilug-ontopic