<div>Thorough spam testing on this email:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Received: from <a href="http://pilot.trilug.org">pilot.trilug.org</a> (localhost [<a href="http://127.0.0.1">127.0.0.1</a>])<br>by <a href="http://pilot.trilug.org">pilot.trilug.org</a> (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917D58421C;<br>
Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:47:58 -0400 (EDT)<br>X-Original-To: <a href="mailto:trilug-ontopic@trilug.org">trilug-ontopic@trilug.org</a><br>Delivered-To: <a href="mailto:trilug-ontopic@trilug.org">trilug-ontopic@trilug.org</a><br>
Received: by <a href="http://pilot.trilug.org">pilot.trilug.org</a> (Postfix, from userid 65534)<br>id 2C4A7846FC; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:07:56 -0400 (EDT)<br>Received: from <a href="http://an-out-0708.google.com">an-out-0708.google.com</a> (<a href="http://an-out-0708.google.com">an-out-0708.google.com</a> [<a href="http://209.85.132.250">209.85.132.250</a>])<br>
by <a href="http://pilot.trilug.org">pilot.trilug.org</a> (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9F0846DB<br>for <<a href="mailto:trilug-ontopic@trilug.org">trilug-ontopic@trilug.org</a>>; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:07:55 -0400 (EDT)<br>
<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/3/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Trevor Little</b> <<a href="mailto:trevormg19@gmail.com">trevormg19@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">CentOS is RHEL with all of the branding (logos, etc) removed. Other than<br>that, it's pretty much the same as RHEL. It's the way to go if you don't<br>
want/have a liscence. Fedora is more of a beta as I understand it. Sort of<br>a test bed. I wouldn't recommend using it in a production environment.<br><br>Trevor<br><br>On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:59:07 -0400, Jason Watts <<a href="mailto:jsnonzzr@gmail.com">jsnonzzr@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>> my misguided knowledge says CentOS vs RHEL same thing... one is free the<br>> other isn't With redhat's you get the support and possibly some<br>> proprietary<br>> code that isn't quite available in CentOS. these two are meant to be<br>
> stable<br>> and more sever oriented. RHEL vs Fedora... Fedora is less stable then<br>> RHEL. Fedora is meant to be the free version of their OS... more for<br>> desktop use. might be wrong here, but you tend to find code that hasn't<br>
> been as tested as their RHEL edition.<br>><br>> jsn<br>><br>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Tom Roche <<a href="mailto:Tom_Roche@pobox.com">Tom_Roche@pobox.com</a>> wrote:<br>><br>>><br>
>> Cristóbal Palmer Tue Jun 3 09:45:58 EDT 2008<br>>> > If you don't want to pay for [an RHEL] license, then you should<br>>> > really be using CentOS.<br>>><br>>> BTW: what's the difference between CentOS, Fedora, and RHEL? I don't<br>
>> quite understand the partitioning, except that I understand (possibly<br>>> incorrectly) that the latter is licensed/supported and the former are<br>>> not. Also, why the coyness @<br>>><br>>> <a href="http://www.centos.org/">http://www.centos.org/</a><br>
>> > CentOS is an Enterprise-class Linux Distribution derived from<br>>> > sources freely provided to the public by a prominent North American<br>>> > Enterprise Linux vendor.<br>>><br>
>> ? It's Red Hat, right?<br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> Trilug-ontopic mailing list<br>>> <a href="mailto:Trilug-ontopic@trilug.org">Trilug-ontopic@trilug.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug-ontopic">http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug-ontopic</a><br>>><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Trilug-ontopic mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Trilug-ontopic@trilug.org">Trilug-ontopic@trilug.org</a><br><a href="http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug-ontopic">http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug-ontopic</a><br></blockquote></div><br>
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>CILCIL