From lopaki at gmail.com  Wed Mar 19 16:49:58 2008
From: lopaki at gmail.com (Scott Lambdin)
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:49:58 -0400
Subject: [Trilug-policy] [TriLUG] Code of Conduct
In-Reply-To: <46C21F2C.4050001@pobox.com>
References: <21543.22440.qm@web31109.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<46C21F2C.4050001@pobox.com>
Message-ID: <529e76830803191349wc34482bwec0c5b4fcc514763@mail.gmail.com>

oh noes!

On 8/14/07, Jeremy Portzer <jeremyp at pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Allen Freeman wrote:
>
> > I submit that no document, be it a standalone CoC or modifications to
> the FAQ,
> > is going to have any meaningful impact on this kind of thing.
> > If the goal in question is to curb such exchanges perhaps list
> moderation is the answer.
>
> But Allen, list moderation is one of the thing the CoC discusses as a
> possible "remedy" to those who are creating a problem.
>
> The idea is to make it fair in how this moderation is applied.  Are you
> saying you'd rather have the "leadership" moderate *everyone*, punishing
> everyone (and creating a huge amount of work) for the actions of a few?
>
> --Jeremy
> _______________________________________________
> Trilug-policy mailing list
> Trilug-policy at trilug.org
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug-policy
>



-- 
CILCIL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug-policy/attachments/20080319/da4caf4c/attachment.htm