[TriLUG] some kernel building observations
Wed, 26 Dec 2001 07:19:16 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Dan Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 06:34:54AM -0500, rpjday wrote:
> > i recently downloaded the CML2 software and was going to make an
> > attempt at figuring it out. given the imminent switch to CML2,
> > will there by any value to kbuild? seems they try to solve the
> > same problem, and all indications are that CML2 will be the new
> > standard.
> CML2 only handles the configuration. kbuild actually handles the system
> that builds the kernel. Thus, yes, there is tremendous value in both.
> See http://www.lwn.net/2001/features/KernelSummit/#saturday
ah, so they're complementary. thanks. my dependency tree just
got larger. sigh.