[TriLUG] Reply-To munging

[Ben Pitzer]

--=-7+nfdlXLJ5KoheXv7MUf
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> But, see, the thing is that there are probably just as few
> people who really want the reply-to munging and the vast=20
> majority are just content to lurk and don't care.  So, whatever
> the list is initially setup as generally stays and the initial
> setup is generally based on what the list creator wants.
>=20
> So, there isn't a majority either way and it falls upon those
> of use who have the intense likes/dislikes to try to persuade
> those who are apathetic.
>=20
> Tanner

Okay, I'll weigh in here, then shut up.  I'm probably one of those that
you might call "apathetic".  Up to a point (as evidenced by the fact
that I'm writing this email).  I'm on a few lists, not many, but among
those, this is the only one doing the header munging.  Personally, I
like it. I mean for most of my replies to go to the list.  But it's also
a matter of what I've gotten used to.  This is the list that I'm most
active on, and now I'm used to the header munging, and I like it that
way.  Baby Bird Syndrome, I guess.  Now, many of the others who you may
count as apathetic are like me.  It's what they're used to, and they
don't feel the need to comment on it further.  So, I won't comment on it
further than to say I like the header munging, and I'd like it to stay.

Regards,
Ben Pitzer

--=-7+nfdlXLJ5KoheXv7MUf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA8O17OLVEMrcXswYQRAnlpAJwLWOVTx/jZ+hDNXNKOxR5CXlycIQCfbkBv
lwCfAVupZdWJadnxnFAtbiA=
=LAPF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-7+nfdlXLJ5KoheXv7MUf--