[TriLUG] NTFS bad?
Bryan Burroughs
beburrou at unity.ncsu.edu
Fri Aug 2 14:42:33 EDT 2002
Yeah, i was contemplating using NTFS partitions, but only as mounted
drives, and not as the / or related directories. Hmmm, somthing to
think about. I might just experiment with a not so important drive to
see how much problems i might have. THanks all.
Bryan Burroughs
Dan Chen wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 07:06:00PM -0400, Bryan Burroughs wrote:
>
>>Having thoughts of using NTFS partitions in a RedHat insallationg, I
>>came across the suggestion that NTFS can "be danngerous to your system."
>>Any thoughts as to why, for an uneducated chap like myself?
>>
>
>As stated in another response, NTFS write support is highly experimental
>presently. In 2.5 (and the 2.4 backports), NextGen NTFS support is
>purportedly much more solid in such a fashion that read support is quite
>good, and write support won't BUG_ON() the kernel ;-)
>
>(I assume by "using NTFS partitions in a Red Hat installation" you mean
>you plan to access NTFS partitions in a production environment, not "I
>mean to base my / partition on NTFS" ;-)
>
--
"It's a one dog town, and he's old and mean..."
-- Garth Brooks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug/attachments/20020802/166be989/attachment.html>
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list