[TriLUG] Handling HTML mail

Tanner Lovelace lovelace at wayfarer.org
Tue Feb 4 22:21:14 EST 2003


On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 21:30, Jon Carnes wrote:
> I would actually write the patch for 2.1.x - which is what I'm currently
> running.  I assume (maybe wrongly) that TriLUG would like to upgrade
> once version 2.1.0 reaches 2.1.1.  There are features in 2.1 that we use
> - only we use work-arounds to get those features (scripts which give us
> the same functionality). 
> 
> Jon 

Jon, I think you assume correctly.  Trilug *would* like to upgrade
to 2.1.x.  The only caveat is we'd like it to be orderly. :-)

So, please help unconfuse me here.  Which patch are you talking
about writing?  One that would strip HTML and attachments, except
that it would allow pgp signatures?  And this would be for 2.1.x?
That sounds like it would be a very good thing to have.

Cheers,
Tanner
-- 
Tanner Lovelace <lovelace at wayfarer.org>
Wayfarer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug/attachments/20030204/8caac6b5/attachment.pgp>


More information about the TriLUG mailing list