Off-Topic? Re: [TriLUG] redhat-config-network question

Chris Hedemark chrish at trilug.org
Thu Feb 27 12:04:31 EST 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 11:53 AM, Sinner from the Prairy 
wrote:

> But, nevertheless, what has all this to do with redhat-config-network ?

What it has to do with is the overall issue of RH pushing people into 
Gnome when they don't want to be there.  That was Lisa's original 
problem, was it not?

> Should we create a trilug-bizantium at trilug.org for all this? I'm kinda 
> not
> enjoying all this pointless discussions.

You may find it pointless, but I'm actually finding it good to hear the 
points of view that may have contributed to the direction that RH's 
distro is going in.  I may not agree, but it is informative nonetheless.

And, of course, there is always the delete key.  Or you can just ignore 
this whole thread.  Freedom of choice is a beautiful thing, Josep.  :)

Chris Hedemark
PGP/GnuPG Public Key at http://yonderway.com/chris/hedemark.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQE+XkUkYPuF4Zq9lvYRAtlJAJ9LdH8ycAu4BMq8csAmESUJYPxrbACbBAzS
Xg/ZIsHI1JRg3kaGM7Vpk1k=
=LASH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the TriLUG mailing list