[TriLUG] redhat-config-network question

Sinner from the Prairy sinner at escomposlinux.org
Sat Mar 1 10:36:08 EST 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 28 February 2003 04:4616pm, Chris Hedemark wrote:
> On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 12:06 PM, Sinner from the Prairy 
wrote:
> > Do not let "harsh words from the most vocal part of the community"
> > deviate from the right path.

> OK fine but what about paying customers?  Note that if you're just
> downloading ISO images for free that you're not the kind of person
> that these guys should be listening to.

his is exactly why I sadi in my previos message this part:

" Because Red Hat users and customers (remmeber the "Inc." part of "Red 
Hat, Inc") both want to be able to work with minimum fuss. The goal is 
to use Linux to work. The goal is not work to configure Linux."

Can you read the word "customers" there? Can you read the part were I 
point out the "Inc" part of Red Hat's name?

I thought that it was crystal clear. It looks like not. "Customers" are 
"paying customers", to be completely explicit.

You seem to agree with my point of view (Red Hat should go the way it's 
paying customers want Red Hat to go). Discussion finished, then.



Salut,
Sinner
- -- 
http://www.ibiblio.org/sinner/     Linux User # 89976
Testing Mandrake 9.0 -    Linux Machine # 38068
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+YNNrSGQa4/zQ9e8RAhlQAKCNVV/kaBIYjtuZ2SZDDi3fGE2GUwCfRuFX
+8Y1sX0HcNdaw45uUPKOXYc=
=rhFu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the TriLUG mailing list