[TriLUG] Problems with apt-get against trilug server?

[Ken Mink]

Thanks Jeremy. I didn't really think it was a problem.

Ken

On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 14:09, Jeremy Portzer wrote:
> For some reason, an upgrade to apt on the server side doesn't generate
> headers in a way that's perfectly compatible with all previous versions
> of apt.  I don't quite understand it, but I am looking into it.  It's
> not anything to really worry about, as the RPMs themselves are still
> signed by Red Hat -- this only has to do with a signature/checksum for
> the release file.  (The release file was never signed anyway.)
> 
> --Jeremy
> 
> -- 
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."--Benjamin Franklin
> " 'Necessity' is the plea for every infringement of human liberty; it
> is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."--William Pitt 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug/attachments/20030811/ef696354/attachment.pgp>