[TriLUG] OT: list fork - moderated and unmoderated

Frye, Matthew Matthew.Frye at rexhealth.com
Tue Feb 10 11:18:55 EST 2004


If anyone wants to complain to the steering committee, fine - do it, but
let's end these inherently off-topic threads (tagged or not) and get back to
work.  

> ----------
> From: 	Jim Ray[SMTP:jim at neuse.net]
> Reply To: 	jim at neuse.net;Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list
> Sent: 	Monday, February 09, 2004 10:23 PM
> To: 	Trilug Discussion
> Subject: 	[TriLUG] OT: list fork - moderated and unmoderated
> 
> If folks are gonna get their panties in such a wad over a joke here and
> there despite the majority of my own posts being a sincere effort to help
> others, me thinks it is time to let those folks form their own moderated
> list.
> 
> I don't need some self righteous pompous ace internet neophyte delivering
> personal instructions to my inbox on netiquette.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tanner Lovelace [mailto:lovelace at wayfarer.org]
> > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 6:01 PM
> > To: jim at neuse.net
> > Subject: Re: [TriLUG] RFC: Mailing list protocol FAQ entry
> > 
> > Jim Ray wrote:
> > >
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: Tanner Lovelace [mailto:lovelace at wayfarer.org]
> > >>Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 4:26 PM
> > >>To: jim at neuse.net
> > >>Subject: Re: [TriLUG] RFC: Mailing list protocol FAQ entry
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > [Jim Ray sez:] you are not my mama.  Please blow it out your ace.  I
> > have
> > > tried to be nice.  Per federal spam laws, please do not send me
> anymore
> > > email.
> > 
> > Hahahaha!  You really don't know your laws do you?  The only federal
> > spam law there is is the CAN-SPAM act that was just passed.  And, there
> > are *no* local spam laws since it preempted it.  All the CAN-SPAM act
> > says is that the sender must not obscure their message.  Oh, and it only
> > refers to commercial e-mail, which this obviously is not.
> > 
> > > Further disrespect *will* result in a complaint to the steering
> > committee
> > > due to your behavior.
> > 
> > I'm sorry, Jim, but respect has to be earned and you so far have shown
> > no willingness to earn any respect at all.  Feel free to complain to the
> > SC all you want about my private e-mail to you but there's absolutely
> > nothing they can do about that.
> > 
> > Tanner
> 
> -- 
> TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/
> TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
> TriLUG PGP Keyring         : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
> 




More information about the TriLUG mailing list