[TriLUG] Whitebox vs. CentOS?
mattfrye at gmail.com
Mon Oct 18 11:02:36 EDT 2004
> Any opinions from the group on differences between the two?
Whitebox is stable and smooth. CentOS does have a more active
community, but the slower pace of WB fits my needs as a model closer
to RHEL and less Fedora-like.
In any case, WB performs well. I can tell you from experience that RH
rpms run without any problems.
> > I've started using CentOS, mainly because I was told that Whitebox was
> > maintained by a single individual, and CentOS was actually a group of
> > people from all over. Not entirely sure if this is true or not, or if
What Mr. Tiemann says may be true, and although I have great respect
for him, for my needs, it doesn't matter. Actually, I see a benefit
to a smaller community - less time is wasted on community white noise
More information about the TriLUG