[TriLUG] How good is "Speakeasy ISP ? "

[Rodent of Unusual Size]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Brendlinger wrote:
> I am paying 42$ for earthlink cable access.  For another 15$ I can get HALF 
> the bandwidth BUT DEDICATED, a STATIC IP, and a very stable network to do 
> Voip on.   
> 
> Of the three, the static ip is the one that intrests me.  I would like to have 
> DNS setup and some servers.  I use dyndns but that gets confusing for host 
> headers if you are going to have different servers.  They also let you do 
> anything you want with your bandwidth and all ports are open.  They actually 
> encurage you to put up a server. 
> 
> What do you all think ?  

I've been using Speakeasy for the last, mm, 2-3 years, ever
since my previous provider sold out to Bell South.  (I don't
even remember their name.)

I've been very pleased with Speakeasy.  Uptime is great, tech
support is likewise great, I've got 8 static IPAs and good
bandwidth, and it costs less than the previous provider.

I'd say go with them.
- --
#ken	P-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBQxBKuJrNPMCpn3XdAQLJnAP/Ry5rsDlYxCsFuNrc5EXvakCoUE31GzQp
JT2mzdazehEn6RZY8ltP39cTB0vrcY9D22b15W9CtyDScSjwFJGpyBO9dEgz5pLX
nwn22g+VH7kbsfz2HOQXOn2XM+MsBpWSe268m9XuvLaVNvjnwWjo1QT1VTG7W56U
50SaS485QFg=
=rRqn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----