[TriLUG] Linux vs Windows comparison criteria?

Phillip Rhodes motley.crue.fan at gmail.com
Wed Nov 9 10:28:34 EST 2005


On 11/9/05, sholton at mindspring.com <sholton at mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> Michael Durbin <mdurbin at bluecg.com> wrote:
>
> > We are preparing to write some components with much more stringent
> > latency/throughput requirements than what we've done so far and are
> > seriously considering writing these in Linux.
>
> Are you concerned about TCP latency or kernel latency?
>
> In the kernel space, there are linux kernels optimized fo
> reduce (or at least make predictable) the inherent kernel
> latency. Many of these are targeted at telecommunications
> applications where latency is mandated.
>
>

Likewise, a lot of optimization work has been done to improve Linux
TCP / networking performance (specifically latency) by people
doing Beowulf cluster stuff. My understanding is that one of
the main reasons Linux took off in the HPC world is exactly
because it's open-source nature allowed the researchers to
optimize the kernel and TCP stack to get the performance they
needed.

So a google search along these lines:

<http://www.google.com/search?q=beowulf%20linux%20tcp%20latency>

might turn up something useful.


HTH...


TTYL,

Phil



More information about the TriLUG mailing list