[TriLUG] Which Fedora Core...
Mike.Parkhurst at samsys.com
Mon Nov 21 13:32:52 EST 2005
To me, "worth the price" is a business decision based mostly on what the
server's function is. What I can say is that RedHat has provided me with
excelent support; quick, knowledeable/accurate, and friendly.
From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On Behalf
Of Corey Mutter
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 12:30 PM
To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list
Subject: Re: [TriLUG] Which Fedora Core...
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 03:36:10AM -0500, James Brigman wrote:
> Russ - I'll offer you another vote for CentOS. I found it at the 3.x
> versions (2.4 kernel) and was pleased by the stability, maturity and
> bugfix activity around the release. I run it on servers as well as
> laptops and get great performance in either server mode or desktop mode.
We're using CentOS at my day job for most things, though a few servers
have actual Red Hat Enterprise Linux. With just one server, the cost
shouldn't be too bad, and you get support from Red Hat (though I've no
personal experience as to whether that support is worth the price).
TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
More information about the TriLUG