[TriLUG] OT: C++ Question
Rick DeNatale
rick.denatale at gmail.com
Tue Jan 31 12:20:49 EST 2006
On 1/31/06, Randy Barlow <rpbarlow at ncsu.edu> wrote:
> Thanks Brian, I don't know what I was thinking there! Removed that
> function, and now we have compilage! Now to move on to the real
> problems (intent errors...)
Don't feel bad.
Back about 20 years ago, I witnessed an interesting little happening
at the Apple booth at OOPSLA. Apple had just come out with a C++
compiler for the Macintosh Programmer's Workshop, and various folks
were trying it out.
One guy in particular took about a half a dozen tries to get a pretty
simple "Hello World" app to compile, and it wasn't compiler bugs which
were doing him in. I figure if Bjarne Stroustrup himself was having
so much trouble working through C++ syntax, NO ONE should feel bad
about it.
<flamebait>
I've managed to avoid it myself. ANSI C is fine, but if I'm looking
for a language which supports higher level constructs like OO, I'll go
for something which is better engineered.
</flamebait>
--
Rick DeNatale
Visit the Project Mercury Wiki Site
http://www.mercuryspacecraft.com/
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list