[TriLUG] TCO - Linux, UNIX, and MS

[OlsonE at aosa.army.mil]

Samba3 or Samba4? I believe it was Samba4 that was supposed to support
it. 

-----Original Message-----
From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On
Behalf Of Lee Fickenscher
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 10:16 AM
To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list
Subject: Re: [TriLUG] TCO - Linux, UNIX, and MS

On Aug 2, 2006, at 8:28 AM, OlsonE at aosa.army.mil wrote:

> I remember seeing something a while back about using SAMBA as your DC.
> While I haven't played with it ...the concept seems pretty neat.

I've used samba as a PDC before. It worked flawlessly. But that is
basically an NT4 domain. Last time I actually checked the samba docs
couldn't act as an active directory master. In reading the docs for OS X
server, it seems that it can act as a active directory master and since
it uses samba and openLDAP I'm guessing that the same can be done on
linux now.

-Lee
-- 
TriLUG mailing list        :
http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member
Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/