[TriLUG] AMD vs. Intel
Jason
jason at monsterjam.org
Wed Aug 2 12:01:57 EDT 2006
actually, its not hooked up to the network right now.. but Its working
absolutely awesome so far.. Im not running a desktop on it, but I do have VNC
installed running icewm for remote gui stuff.. and also the FreeNX server
emerged and works great as well.. Im in the process of converting my current
server @ monsterjam.org over to it.. Itll be running my firewall, print
server, apache/php, mysql, samba, dhcp, ntp, and other things.
but im running 2.6.17 on it and its been flawless so far.. Ill get you my USE
statement tonight.
Jason
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:50:24AM -0400,
OlsonE at aosa.army.mil wrote: > What are you using for:
>
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=""?
>
> How is it working? Are you using a GUI (which one)?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On
> Behalf Of Jason
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 11:48 AM
> To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list
> Subject: Re: [TriLUG] AMD vs. Intel
>
> I just installed gentoo on a 500Mhz ultrasparc II box.. that count? ;)
>
> Jason
>
> On Wed, Aug
> 02, 2006 at 11:09:38AM -0400, Greg Brown wrote:
> > What ever happened to my Digital Unix box running on 64 bit Alpha
> chips?
> > And that was 1995 or 1996. One would think we would be further down
> > the 64 bit path by this point.
> >
> > On 8/2/06, OlsonE at aosa.army.mil <OlsonE at aosa.army.mil> wrote:
> > >
> > >Jim,
> > >
> > >Same issues here with x64 as well. What a shame. I'll be content once
> > >x64 Linux is a little more mainstream (and less buggy).
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On
>
> > >Behalf Of Jim Ray
> > >Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 5:38 PM
> > >To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list
> > >Subject: Re: [TriLUG] AMD vs. Intel
> > >
> > >yes, really. not that anyone cares to discuss winders in this group;
>
> > >however, symantec antivirus corporate edition as well as winder's own
>
> > >WSUS puke hard with 64 bit Windows 2003 Server.
> > >
> > >from a server point of view, that's a show stopper and very specific.
> > >WinXP64 is not a server OS. i'll defer judgement on 64 bit desktops
> > >to others since the majority of my customers have 32 bit hardware and
>
> > >don't care.
> > >
> > >all the best for a happy and safe move to NY just the same, though.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >
> > >Jim
> > >
> > >Jim Ray, President
> > >Neuse River Networks
> > >2610 Vanderbilt Ave.
> > >Raleigh, NC 27607-7247
> > >
> > >tel: 919-838-1672
> > >cell: 919-606-1772
> > >http://www.Neuse.Net
> > >
> > >Connecting You to the World since 1997
> > >
> > >Matthew Lavigne wrote:
> > >> Really? I have only seen that basically anything that runs as a
> > >> service looks for 64 bit and then dies (namely Antivirus). In my
> > >> old shop (yes, it is not mine anymore) we installed and ran
> > >> everything as
> > >> 32 bit with the exception of antivirus. In the course of 24 months
>
> > >> we
> > >
> > >> have never had a conflict where an application acted badly other
> > >> then trying to install again a 32 bit antivirus on WinXP64.
> > >>
> > >> A little more qualification would be nice rather then
> > >> generalizations,
> > >
> > >> especially if you have some known bad applications.
> > >>
> > >> Personally I have found very little that would force me to 64 bit
> > >> Windows though the workstation that I have (along with the 6GB of
> > >> system memory) would drive me to. It is not difficult to use the
> > >> /PAE
> > >
> > >> switch or several others to push the memory limits around
> > >> (especially if you have Xeon CPUs).
> > >>
> > >> This box isn't linux yet cause there is too much that I need to
> > >> convert to a vmware image before I move it over...
> > >>
> > >> Matthew Lavigne
> > >> Preparing to move to NY....
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Quoting Jim Ray <jim at neuse.net>:
> > >>
> > >>> Winders has 64 bit versions. I don't use them because too many
> > >>> apps are broken.
> > >>>
> > >>> Jim Ray, President
> > >>> Neuse River Networks
> > >>>
> > >>> tel: 919-838-1672
> > >>> http://www.Neuse.Net
> > >>>
> > >>> Connecting You to the World since 1997
> > >>>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org
> > >>>> [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On Behalf Of Greg Brown
> > >>>> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 11:10 AM
> > >>>> To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list
> > >>>> Subject: Re: [TriLUG] AMD vs. Intel
> > >>>>
> > >>>> You bring up an interesting point. My neighbor just purchased a
> > >>>> new
> > >
> > >>>> laptop
> > >>>> that has a 64 bit processor. Can XPee Home even take
> > >>>> advantage of a 64 bit
> > >>>> processor?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> She's already fed up with the anti-virus she is using and has
> > >>>> already asked about Linux (after hearing me yap about it for
> > >>>> years now). Hopefully she'll pull the trigger and I can intall
> > >>>> Ubuntu as a social expirement. I'd really like to see how well a
>
> > >>>> seriously non-techincal person manages with Ubuntu.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 7/28/06, Kevin Flanagan <kevin at flanagannc.net> wrote:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > That would have to fall in the "that depends" category.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > What would you be doing with the system, for a laptop, I
> > >>>> see that HP
> > >>>> > now has a Turion 64Bit laptop, interesting if you could
> > >>>> take advantage
> > >>>> > of the processor.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > If you are using much CPU to Memory transfer intensive
> > >>>> applications,
> > >>>> > then AMD has the edge, otherwise I don't think that it
> > >>>> matters as much.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > What about the other stuff, that says more in many cases.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > What disks are available, SATA, or PATA, or SCSI?
> > >>>> > What Video subsystem suits your needs best?
> > >>>> > How much RAM can you get for the system in question?
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > As usual, there's a lot more to the "best" answer,
> > >>>> generally I think
> > >>>> > that if you get a top tier system now it's likely enough for
> > >>>> > 95% or more of folks, unless you're just that kind of geek who
> > >>>> needs to spec
> > >>>> > out every last detail.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Then there's cost.....
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Kevin
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Greg Brown wrote:
> > >>>> > > It was not long ago at all, just last year, that the
> > >>>> > > prevailing opinion of those on Trilug seemed to be that AMD
> > >>>> > > was
> > >>>> leading the way
> > >>>> > > for chip
> > >>>> > design
> > >>>> > > for the foreseeable future. With Intel's latest
> > >>>> > > announcements, along with the Core Duo, I was wondering what
> > >>>> > > the
> > >>>> consensus opinion
> > >>>> > > was these days.
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > If you were going to build a linux desktop or laptop what
> > >>>> processor
> > >>>> > would
> > >>>> > > you pick? Intel, AMD, or something else?
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > 3.... 2..... 1..... FIGHT!!
> > >>>> > --
> > >>>> > TriLUG mailing list :
> > >>>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> > >>>> > TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG
> > >>>> > Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> TriLUG mailing list :
> > >>>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> > >>>> TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member
>
> > >>>> Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> TriLUG mailing list :
> > >>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> > >>> TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member
> > >>> Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >--
> > >TriLUG mailing list :
> > >http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> > >TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member
> > >Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
> > >--
> > >TriLUG mailing list :
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> > >TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member
> > >Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
> > >
> > --
> > TriLUG mailing list :
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> > TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member
> > Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
>
> --
> ================================================
> | Jason Welsh jason at monsterjam.org |
> | http://monsterjam.org DSS PGP: 0x5E30CC98 |
> | gpg key: http://monsterjam.org/gpg/ |
> ================================================
>
> --
> TriLUG mailing list :
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member
> Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
> --
> TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
> TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
--
================================================
| Jason Welsh jason at monsterjam.org |
| http://monsterjam.org DSS PGP: 0x5E30CC98 |
| gpg key: http://monsterjam.org/gpg/ |
================================================
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list