[TriLUG] Another seal broken... thinking of installing a C/R anti-spam system

[David McDowell]

In this thread we've seen some metrics and performance opinions on
greylisting... what about the latest spamassassin working with
sa-update?



On 1/28/07, Cristóbal Palmer <cristobalpalmer at gmail.com> wrote:
> GPG doesn't really mean much for people using webmail.
>
> Suggestion there?
>
> -CMP
>
> On 1/28/07, Daniel Sterling <dan at lost-habit.com> wrote:
> > Jon Carnes wrote:
> > > You wouldn't have to check the authentication of every message passing
> > > through, but you could if you wanted to. Ideally though, you would just
> > > check the ones that seem suspicious.
> >
> > Well, if you're talking about issues of trust, GPG does this already, now.
> >
> > If you like, you can only accept properly signed email, and you can go
> > further and only accept properly signed email from people you trust.
> > However, again, for this to work to stop all spam, everybody would have
> > to adopt it, and keys used by spammers would have to be blacklisted.
> >
> > -- Dan
> >
> > --
> > TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> > TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/
> > TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
> >
>
>
> --
> Cristóbal M. Palmer
> UNC-CH SILS Student -- ils.unc.edu/~cmpalmer
> TriLUG Vice Chair
> "There are many roads to enlightenment, and thus many roads back to
> the One True Debian" --crimsun
>
> --
> TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/
> TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
>
>