[TriLUG] OT: Low cost way to offline 3 Tb
hunteke at earlham.edu
Tue Jan 22 10:51:47 EST 2008
Eh, perhaps. That implies that you've already got the tape peripherals,
etc., which costs bucks. John, you might give us some pointers with the
kind of budget with which you've got to work, and the timeframe of
storage. weeks? months? years? millenia?
At 10:35a -0500 on 22 Jan 2008, William Sutton wrote:
> I'm surprised nobody has suggested it yet (or at least that it hasn't made
> my inbox), but probably the lowest cost would be tapes.
> William Sutton
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, John Mitchell wrote:
>> Does anyone have a suggestion for a low cost method of saving 3
>> TeraBytes offline?
More information about the TriLUG