[TriLUG] cause for alarm?

Greg Brown gwbrown1 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 6 08:58:48 EDT 2008


I'm 64 and 264 stay open I'm going this afternoon.  I just wish heat killed
mosquitoes.

Greg

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Jim Ray <jim at neuse.net> wrote:

> No, nonsense. My superior analytical ability says go to the Outer Banks
> now, ask questions later. Don't forget the sunscreen.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On
> Behalf Of Roberto J. Dohnert
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 12:03 AM
> To: Triangle Linux Users Group General Discussion
> Subject: Re: [TriLUG] cause for alarm?
>
> Ye should wait until the fires die down.  I was talking with a buddy of
> mine whom works for TWC.  He couldnt give me many details except to tell
> me he couldnt give me many details but the detail he did give me was
> that this is a test and its going to hit the major metropolitan areas,
> Texas, Florida, New York, CA etc before it hots NC, but he couldnt tell
> me when/if this will affect NC anytime soon.
>
> Jim Ray wrote:
> > Well, I think we should do some on site diagnosis at the earliest
> > possible convenience. Do not forget to bring technical tools like
> > surfboard (and I don't mean some motorola modem).
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On
> > Behalf Of Greg Brown
> > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 8:43 PM
> > To: Triangle Linux Users Group General Discussion
> > Subject: [TriLUG] cause for alarm?
> >
> > After all this discussion of possible metering on TWC I decided to
> > check the stats on my public router on at the outer banks (the public
> > wi-fi network - I figured, if any network, a public one would have a
> > lot of bandwidth eaten up).  What I found was interesting:
> >
> > In/out packets 44281817/56033743 (1.86 GB/3.83 GB)
> >
> > 'cuse me?  More outbound than inbound?  This particular modem has a
> > 3/1 connection so the outbound is faster than most however I still
> > would have thought, over 60 days, the download would have been much
> > higher than the upload.  I wonder if the counters wrapped.
> >
> > What think yee?
> >
> > greg
> >
>
> --
> TriLUG mailing list        :
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>
>
> --
> TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>



More information about the TriLUG mailing list