[TriLUG] Time Warner Cable not through fighting

Sat May 9 11:50:34 EDT 2009

It looks like the bill (hb 1252/s1004) is being delayed a year.  :-)
http://www.newsobserver.com/business/story/1520084.html

Funny, all the comments on the article were bashing TWC. Now why would 
they do that? O:-)

73,
Neil, WA4AZL

Michael Kimsal wrote:
> Wow.  No one replied to me, not even my own reps for my area.  :(
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:28 PM, <OlsonE at aosa.army.mil> wrote:
>
>   
>> Looks like out of all the phone calls and e-mails to the people below, one
>> gave me a response:
>>
>> "Thank you for your e-mail on the regulation of competition between local
>> government and private businesses that provide communication services to the
>> public (Senate Bill 1004). It must be a priority of the state to expand
>> broadband access.
>>
>> I will take your thoughts into consideration as Senate Bill 1004 comes
>> before me in the Senate.
>>
>> Again, I appreciate your e-mail, and please feel free to contact me again
>> if you have other concerns on this or other legislation.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Josh Stein"
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On
>> Behalf Of Ron Young
>> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 8:22 AM
>> To: Triangle Linux Users Group General Discussion
>> Subject: Re: [TriLUG] Time Warner Cable not through fighting
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Here is a concise list of the Senators on the Commerce committee:
>>
>> RC.Soles at ncleg.net, Floyd.McKissick at ncleg.net, David.Hoyle at ncleg.net,
>> Tony.Rand at ncleg.net, Tom.Apodaca at ncleg.net, Tony.Foriest at ncleg.net,
>> Larry.Shaw at ncleg.net, Phil.Berger at ncleg.net, Doug.Berger at ncleg.net,
>> Harris.Blake at ncleg.net, Julia.Boseman at ncleg.net,
>> Peter.Brunstetter at ncleg.net,
>> Debbie.Clary at ncleg.net, Katie.Dorsett at ncleg.net, James.Forrester at ncleg.net
>> ,
>> Linda.Garrou at ncleg.net, Eddie.Goodall at ncleg.net, Steve.Goss at ncleg.net,
>> Malcolm.Graham at ncleg.net, Neal.Hunt at ncleg.net, Jim.Jacumin at ncleg.net,
>> Clark.Jenkins at ncleg.net, Martin.Nesbitt at ncleg.net,
>> William.Purcell at ncleg.net,
>> Bob.Rucho at ncleg.net, Josh.Stein at ncleg.net, Richard.Stevens at ncleg.net,
>> Don.Vaughan at ncleg.net
>>
>>
>> Ron Young
>> 919-621-9015
>>
>> +++++++++++++++++++
>> Little tiny dreams require little tiny thoughts and little tiny steps.
>> Great big dreams require great big thoughts and little tiny steps.
>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:04 AM, <OlsonE at aosa.army.mil> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> I think it's about time I ditch TW.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On
>>> Behalf Of mgmonza
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 12:34 AM
>>> To: Triangle Linux Users Group General Discussion
>>> Subject: Re: [TriLUG] Time Warner Cable not through fighting
>>>
>>> Mark Turner wrote:
>>>       
>>>> When it looked as if the House bill would be appropriately dispatched
>>>> today, the folks at Time Warner Cable opted to try their luck with the
>>>> Senate version.
>>>>
>>>> It goes to the Senate Commerce committee early tomorrow at 8 AM. Yes,
>>>> that's right: 8 AM.
>>>>
>>>> If you're a night owl and have the time, please call the committee
>>>> members at this list and let them know what you think of this bad
>>>> bill. Just by leaving voicemail you can make a difference.
>>>>
>>>> You can find the list of members here:
>>>>
>>>>         
>> http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/Committees/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommittee&sActionDetails=Senate%20Standing_67
>>     
>>>> My blog about today's House meeting:
>>>>
>>>>         
>> http://www.markturner.net/2009/05/06/time-warner-cable-protection-act-not-dead-yet/
>>     
>>>> --
>>>> Mark Turner
>>>> www.markturner.net
>>>> --
>>>> TriLUG mailing list        :
>>>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>>>> TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Thanks for the heads-up, the pertinent info and the list of names and
>>> numbers.  This is too easy - making excuses not to call is now more work
>>> than to call, so I'm a-callin.
>>>
>>>
>>> MG
>>> --
>>> TriLUG mailing list        :
>>>       
>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>>     
>>> TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>>> --
>>> TriLUG mailing list        :
>>>       
>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>>     
>>> TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>> TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>> TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>> --
>> TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>> TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   