SAGE/Usenix membership
H. Wade Minter
minter at lunenburg.org
Mon Mar 14 22:13:37 EST 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 14, 2005, at 11:08 AM, Matt Pusateri wrote:
> Hello list,
>
>
> I am contemplating joining SAGE and or Usenix. Can anyone who is
> currently a member or former member provide some feedback? I'm
> looking to ascertain what you find valuable or invaluable about either
> memebership?
I renewed my SAGE membership after a lapse of several years at the LISA
conference last fall. I wasn't that impressed when I was a member back
in the late 90s, but figured I'd give it another shot.
So far, the only semi-useful thing I've seen out of SAGE is their
mailing list. The traffic over the last several months has been
alright, not particularly relevant to what I do, but of decent
technical content. However, the list itself is pretty useless because
the list admin rejects mail with what they call "Enclosures", and what
everyone else calls "Content-type: headers". Yes, if your mailer
inserts a Content-type: header (as most mailers do nowadays), they'll
reject your post. So unless you like telnetting to port 25, you may
have a hard time getting anything posted to the list, which tends to
limit its usefulness.
So I'm not getting any value for my $40. I doubt seriously I'll renew
my subscription again.
- --Wade
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCNlLho4DwsyRGDscRAvQoAJ40FtNXKm+ZtX6nyJ7DG7KAYsKVAACgoDVZ
1aWlEXCyqAR8B7VQh+7bU7Y=
=eScQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the ncsa-discussion
mailing list