[Trilug-ontopic] CentOS/Fedora/RHEL? was: RHEL5 help..

[Jason Watts]

I thought CentOS was compiled by a separate from Red Hat entity... not
really sure on that...  sheepishly I say... i don't know, I just use it.

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Ian Kilgore <ian at trilug.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:59:07PM -0400, Jason Watts wrote:
> > my misguided knowledge says CentOS vs RHEL  same thing... one is free the
> > other isn't  With redhat's you get the support and possibly some
> proprietary
> > code that isn't quite available in CentOS.  these two are meant to be
> stable
> > and more sever oriented.  RHEL vs Fedora... Fedora is less stable then
> > RHEL.  Fedora is meant to be the free version of their OS... more for
> > desktop use.  might be wrong here, but you tend to find code that hasn't
> > been as tested as their RHEL edition.
> >
> > jsn
> >
>
> CentOS is RHEL without Red Hat branding or support.  Fedora is
> different.
> --
> Ian Kilgore
> print/42;       # n/,"Just another Perl hacker,\n"
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIRYDpdzZ1vlGDxu4RAsFkAKCKHCSkaiumDgKnPobsmWk0g4zUUgCfS0Z7
> EYrmjfcI5VOlO9w7uY8DLvs=
> =Rcal
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trilug-ontopic mailing list
> Trilug-ontopic at trilug.org
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug-ontopic
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug-ontopic/attachments/20080603/20a438d4/attachment.htm