[TriLUG] Upgrade to RH 7.2, no gcc>2.96 update from Red Hat
Ed Hill
ed at eh3.com
Wed Jan 23 14:09:23 EST 2002
On Wed, 2002-01-23 at 06:40, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> Rodent of Unusual Size [Ken.Coar at golux.com] wrote:
> > Cool enough. But when I told it to go ahead, it brought
> > up the gritch (which I had forgotten) about gcc 2.96 not
> > being officially supported by the kernel devos. So I looked
> > on RH's update site, but they have nothing newer (though it's
> > been a few months now).
> >
> > What is the appropriate thing to do? Stick with 2.96,
> > up/downgrade to some other version, wait for RH to supply
> > an update RPM?
>
> I'm doubting RH will supply an updated RPM before 8.x; they definitely
> fix bugs in their current codebase, but they don't change things like
> compilers across minor versions.
>
> On the other hand, 2.96-84 is very solid and does not have the bugs
> that caused the original uproar about them releasing a compiler
> early. Just make sure you've got the latest updates and you're fine.
I don't have the URL to prove it, but I'm fairly certain that Alan Cox
stated that recent releases of RH's gcc 2.96 is just fine for kernel
compilations.
Ed
--
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
Post-Doctoral Researcher | Email: ed at eh3.com, ehill at mines.edu
Division of ESE | URL: http://www.eh3.com
Colorado School of Mines | Phone: 303-273-3483
Golden, CO 80401 | Fax: 303-273-3311
Key fingerprint = 5BDE 4DA1 66BE 4F7B BC17 3A0C 932B 7266 1E76 F123
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug/attachments/20020123/78b8947f/attachment.pgp>
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list