[TriLUG] Questions on dyndns.org

Mike Mueller mjm-58 at mindspring.com
Thu Oct 3 18:57:27 EDT 2002


On Thursday 03 October 2002 18:22, Jeremy Portzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 18:08, Mike Mueller wrote:
> > Actually analogies can be flawed.  For instance, 800 service is served by
> > two levels of databases along with a GTT database to help find the
> > databases. When a switch is translating an 800 number it launches a query
> > to a GTT service that actually rewrites the query at the datalink level
> > and redirects the query to the database that informs the switch of the
> > service provider that has the 800 number. Then a second query is launched
> > using the point code of the 800 service provider's 800 database to get
> > the actual phone number. This system was implemented to support 800
> > number portability so an 800 number can be served by AT&T or Sprint at
> > the 800 number payer's discretion. Now the same portability scheme is
> > being applied to land lines.  Soon it will applied to wireless numbers. 
> > This is kind of like DNS but there are some things that are not like DNS
> > either.
>
> I understand that the technical details are different.  I was referring
> to the conceptual idea that DNS deals with IP addresses only, not port
> numbers, which I'm sure you understand just fine.  Just like an 800
> number deals with phone numbers, not whether you use a fax or voice.
>
> :-)  I'll stop beating this dead horse.  Maybe there are some newbies on
>
> the list who benefited from this discussion, however... :-)

I am the newbie that benefited from the discussion.  As you can tell, I have 
a head full of telephone cr*p that doesn't matter anymore.  IT and VoIP is 
all that matters now.  In the future when you use the telephone analogy say 
that telephone number translation is like DNS rather than DNS is like DN 
xlation - that way you imply which is the dominant technology :-).  DNS and 
LDAP will be the xlation technologies to know going forward.  Luckily, IP 
numbers are already portable and there no monopoly control of them so there 
is no need for band-aid technology to remedy that situation.

-- 
mueller, mike

The larger purpose of the economic order, including Wall Street, is to 
support the material conditions for human existence, not to undermine and 
destabilize them.

-Editorial, The Nation, August 19, 2002



More information about the TriLUG mailing list