[TriLUG] Computer Getting Slow

Dan Monjar daniel.monjar at na.biomerieux.com
Fri Aug 22 09:29:13 EDT 2003


--On Thursday, August 21, 2003 08:48:54 PM -0400 Jim Ray <jim at neuse.net> 
wrote:

> if it is quicker to re-load a system with
> pristine code that to figure out who did what in a past life, then it is
> more of a benefit to the client to get the job done right for a lower
> price.

Now that is a short-sighted approach... it might be quicker for you, but 
how much time does your client waste getting his now 'pristine' machine 
back to the way he had it configured before you wiped it out?  Not only 
does he waste his time this go around, but he'll waste it again in a few 
weeks or month when the problems happens again and you, again, give him 
back a 'pristine' machine.  Because you never really did solve the problem, 
did you?

--
Daniel Monjar
IS Manager, Technical Services
bioMérieux, Inc.
Durham, NC US
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug/attachments/20030822/3291fd5d/attachment.pgp>


More information about the TriLUG mailing list